SIXTH COLUMN

"History is philosophy teaching by example." (Lord Bolingbroke)

New Email Address: 6thColumn@6thcolumnagainstjihad.com.

Friday, May 13, 2005

Can Your Blood Pressure Take This?

Once formed, bureaucracies exists primarily to sustain and serve themselves at the expense of those who are supposedly to benefit from the bureaucracy in the first place. That is why all existing bureaucracies and all new ones must have expiration limits to their existences and their regulatory powers. This story shows how the managerial bureaucrats in the Border Patrol have lost sight of the objective which caused them to be formed in the first place.

Typically, they are in the CYA mode (cover your a__) regarding the efficacy of the Minute Men.

Minute Men really just augmented the Border Patrol, but they refused artificial constraints such as political correctness. They had a clear mission and carried it out to the letter. From the President to the lowest bureaucrats, the Minute Men have been resented. WHY? Because they worked so well at their mission.

The Border Patrol managers are not concerned with protecting America. No, no, not as their main job. They are concerned with protecting their worthless derriers. And, worst of all, protecting their worthless butts means far more to them than protecting the territorial sovereignty of America.

I first heard this story on Fox and Friends this morning. Appreciative Border Patrol agents have been letting leak out what their managers have been doing to sustain Border Patrol mediocrity. Then, sure enough, the Washington Times carries the story. To follow are excerpts from their report.


Border Patrol told to stand down in Arizona - The Washington Times: Nation/Politics - May 13, 2005


Border Patrol told to stand down in Arizona
By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published May 13, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Border Patrol agents have been ordered not to arrest illegal aliens along the section of the Arizona border where protesters patrolled last month because an increase in apprehensions there would prove the effectiveness of Minuteman volunteers, The Washington Times has learned.

More than a dozen agents, all of whom asked not to be identified for fear of retribution, said orders relayed by Border Patrol supervisors at the Naco, Ariz., station made it clear that arrests were "not to go up" along the 23-mile section of border that the volunteers monitored to protest illegal immigration.


"It was clear to everyone here what was being said and why," said one veteran agent. "The apprehensions were not to increase after the Minuteman volunteers left. It was as simple as that."


Another agent said the Naco supervisors "were clear in their intention" to keep new arrests to an "absolute minimum" to offset the effect of the Minuteman vigil, adding that patrols along the border have been severely limited.


Border Patrol Chief David V. Aguilar at the agency's Washington headquarters called the accusations "outright wrong," saying that supervisors at the Naco station had not blocked agents from making arrests and that the station's 350 agents were being "supported in carrying out" their duties.


"Border Patrol agents are the front line of defense against terrorism," Chief Aguilar said, adding that the 11,000 agents nationwide are "meeting that challenge, head-on ... as daunting a task as that may sound."


The chief -- a former head of the agency's Tucson sector, which includes the Naco station -- said that with the world watching the Arizona border because of the Minuteman Project, agents in Naco "demonstrated flexibility and resilience in carrying out their critical homeland security duties and responsibilities."


But Rep. Tom Tancredo, Colorado Republican, yesterday said "credible sources" within the Border Patrol also had told him of the decision by Naco supervisors to keep new arrests to a minimum, saying he was angry but not surprised. "It's like telling a cop to stand by and watch burglars loot a store but don't arrest any of them," he said. "This is another example of decisions being made at the highest levels of the Border Patrol that are hurting morale and helping to rot the agency from within.

Mr. Tancredo, chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, blamed the Bush administration for setting an immigration enforcement tone that suggests to those enforcing the law that he is not serious about secure borders. "We need to get the president to come to grips with the seriousness of the problem," he said. "I know he doesn't like to utter the words, 'I was wrong,' but if we have another incident like September 11 by people who came through our borders without permission, I hope he doesn't have to say 'I'm sorry.' "

Several field agents credited the volunteers with cutting the flow of illegal aliens in the targeted Naco area, saying the number of apprehended illegals dropped from an average of 500 a day to less than 15 a day. More than 850 volunteers, in a protest of the lax immigration enforcement policies of the White House and Congress, sought to reduce the flow of illegal aliens along a popular immigration corridor on the Arizona-Mexico border near Naco by reporting illegals to the Border Patrol as they crossed into the United States. Their goal was to show that increased manpower on the border would effectively deter illegal immigration. Organizers said the protest resulted in Border Patrol arrests of 349 illegal aliens.


Area residents, in a half-page ad in the Sunday edition of the Sierra Vista Herald, told the volunteers: "Thanks for doing what our government won't -- close the border to illegal aliens. It was the quietest month we've had in many years ... You made us feel safe because the border was closed." (Emphases mine)



This is an issue for which Americans must really take up their pitchforks. The illegals and terrorists flow freely across the border because of the unseriousness of the managers of the Border Patrol, who want to do nothing but whine how they "couldn't help it." We citizens can make this right, if we keep our eyes on the prize.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home