SIXTH COLUMN

"History is philosophy teaching by example." (Lord Bolingbroke)

New Email Address: 6thColumn@6thcolumnagainstjihad.com.

Saturday, April 30, 2005

Sgt. "Akbar" Is Oh, So Sorry About Kuwait Grenade Attack

FOXNews.com - Akbar Sorry About Kuwait Grenade Attack, FORT BRAGG, N.C. — A military jury Thursday began deliberating whether a U.S. soldier should be executed for killing two officers in a grenade attack in Kuwait — murders for which the defendant apologized in a brief, barely audible courtroom statement.

"I want to apologize for the attack that occurred. I felt that my life was in jeopardy, and I had no other options. I also want to ask you for forgiveness," Akbar told the 15-person military jury before deliberations began.

(Emphases mine)



How about some more crocodile tears for the ol' sarge? He was so "remorseful" that he chocked on his words, or so it seemed. And he felt his life was in jeopardy, he says. He's not lying, is he? Is he calling on one of those Islamic lying techniques? Naw, couldn't be...

Well, with Islam, if you are in for an inch, you are in for the whole mile. "Sarge" killed fellow soldiers on purpose, out of a sense of Islamic duty. Now he is "sorry"? He might be having a spell of the chicken-shits, but he "ain't" sorry. With the help of his hostile, militant parents, he converted to Islam to join the other hostile American blacks who now make up some 50% of American Muslims by conversion.

Islam is not complicated. Were it complicated, centuries of ignorant, illiterate, impoverished sand savages could not have been so successfully brainwashed. "Sarge" was smart enough to become sargeant, even if he was not the sharpest knife in the Army mess. Filled with all of this blacks versus America brainwashing, he found something that could excuse his inadequacies as a human: Islam. Now he could "belong." He had a few dirt-simple rules to follow, and, voila, he was "somebody," because he belonged to the globe's biggest collective, the ummah. At their heyday, communists could never muster this many humans into their collectivism.

"Sarge" put Islam ahead of his oath to the Constitution. This was despite his having been born and raised in some cloaca like Detroit or its equivalent, all of which are AMERICA, and all of which at their worst are better than all of the Middle East taken collectively at its best. He put an ideology more evil than communism+Nazism ahead of his allegiance to America. He identified himself as Muslim, in this case Arab-Muslim, even though he is clearly not an Arab.

Prosecutors have said Akbar launched the attack at his camp — days before the soldiers were to move into Iraq — because he was concerned about U.S. troops killing fellow Muslims in the Iraq war. Akbar is the first American since the Vietnam era to be prosecuted on charges of murdering a fellow soldier during wartime.



The issue of mental illness is just so much persiflage. It's lawyerosis, a stand-in for the truth. He either did it or did not do it, and the jury found that he did it. And, Islam is not a mental illness. Being Muslim does not merit a long-term stay at the funny farm at taxpayers' expense.

Whether they kill him or incarcerate him, he should never see freedom again, nor be allowed to associate with other "prisoners" whom he can "convert" in a likely future role as jailhouse imam.

The prosecutor had it right: (Emphases mine)


"He is a hate-filled, ideologically driven murderer," the prosecutor said, adding that Akbar wrote in his diary in 1997, "My life will not be complete unless America is destroyed." If given a death sentence, Akbar would join five others on the military's death row at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. The last U.S. military execution was in 1961.



We must never forget that we have been given the opportunity to see the true face of Islam.

**************

Since we wrote the foregoing yesterday, the jury has sentenced ol' "Sarge" to death, and he will go to Death Row. This is indeed good news, in principle. Better news would be that his execution is (a.) unstoppable, and (b.) takes place later today.



Story: Jury Returns Death Sentence in GI Killings on Yahoo! News, by ESTES THOMPSON, Associated Press WriterFri Apr 29, 8:24 AM ET

Jurors took about seven hours to reach their decision Thursday. Last week, the same 15-person military jury took just two and a half hours last week to convict Akbar of premeditated murder and attempted premeditated murder. The sentence will be reviewed by a commanding officer and automatically appealed. If Akbar is executed, it would be by lethal injection.



However, methodical, emotion-free due process must be followed, and that we accept. Sadly, "Akbar" will probably die of old age in prison before any execution can be carried out.

Although the defense contends Akbar was too mentally ill to plan the attack, they have never disputed that he threw grenades into troop tents in the early morning darkness and then fired on soldiers in the ensuing chaos. Akbar's father, John Akbar, has said his son complained in vain to his superiors about religious and racial harassment before the attack. The defense never introduced any witnesses to testify about any such harassment.


Isn't it always that way with losers? "Religious" and "racial" harrassment? Why, he couldn't help it. He was tormented into defending himself. Didn't Marx say that we are all products of our environment? Said the wives of the soldiers murdered by "Akbar":

"Hasan Akbar has robbed me of so many things," said Tammie Eslinger, Stone's fiancee, after the sentencing. "He stole my love, my family, my dreams and my future. But he could never steal my spirit." Seifert's widow, Theresa, said she was satisfied with the military justice system. She called Akbar "a nonentity to me."



The only moral response to this murderer is to administer JUSTICE, and not mercy.

2 Comments:

  • At Sun May 01, 04:43:00 PM PDT, Blogger Always On Watch said…

    "Sorry" doesn't cut it! He's not really sorry that he killed his fellow soldiers; rather, he's sorry that (1) he got caught and didn't get his 72 virgins and/or (2) he's sorry that he couldn't do more damage to U.S. forces.

    How many others like Akbar are within our armed forces? Does the Pentagon not understand that a Muslim's first allegiance is to the Nation of Islam?

     
  • At Thu Dec 28, 10:46:00 PM PST, Blogger levotb said…

    The above post of May 1st asks "How many other like Akbar are within our armed forces?" That is not the only question that needs to be asked of the Pentagon, but an important one to be sure. A CSM (Christian Science Monitor) pro-Muslim story came out today that has rocked me and will rock others who care about preserving the U.S. Read the following post at Yahoo:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20061227/ts_csm/amuslimtroop

    There are over 3,000 Muslim Americans in the Armed forces. Another scary story is the one from May 4th from Michelle Malkin:

    http://michellemalkin.com/archives/005130.htm

    about gang banging illegal aliens the Marines and Army have vetted and allowed into the service. It's really scary. And if this isn't scary enough, a story about the Pentagon wanting to INCREASE illegal aliens (READ: ILLEGAL ALIEN GANG BANGERS) in the Armed forces!!

    Some conservative Congressman like Duncan Hunter should "run" with this football, call for hearings, drag the big brass in and, in public, make them answer the question: Why has the Pentagon brought in illegal aliens to the military, who started it and who is currently responsible for it?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home