What CAIR and the White House Don't Tell Us About the Dubai and Our Ports
"CAIR's Dubai Sugar Daddy"
by Paul Sperry
A whole lot of infiltrating and bonding going on among the elite of the Arab World and that of the United States.
Will the ports deal be axed? Probably not BECAUSE this superficial little deal is nothing compared to all the other high-level, and sometimes behind the scenes, that we, the "little people," could and should never be allowed to understand.
The following revealed nugget should also make you sick:
"The Islamist Port of Miami."
by Joe Kaufman
Among those that run the State of Florida-owned port is Deputy Port Director of Miami, Khalid Salahuddin. Salahuddin is no stranger to controversy:
From the news report:
But the high numbers of felons on the port's workforce, often "dirty with drugs" and who knows what else, doesn't perturb the Deputy Director:
More about Salahuddin from Kaufman:
(See the original article for the many internal links)
There is reason for alarm for the infiltration and penetration is astounding. The associations and contacts of people like Deputy Port Director Salahuddin magnify the problems and the danger we face.
Finally, Kaufman asks a pertinent questions and then makes an observation:
Could this be the reason why our borders are wide open and the ports so poorly check?
by Paul Sperry
A whole lot of infiltrating and bonding going on among the elite of the Arab World and that of the United States.
Truth be told, CAIR has an otherwise glaring conflict of interest in speaking out about the White House-approved deal to give UAE-owned Dubai Ports World control of six of our ports effective March 2. And it's something that producers at FOX, CNN and NBC should know before they ever book another CAIR flack. Here's what CAIR is hiding:
The U.S.-based executives of Dubai Ports World report to the emir of Dubai, who owns controlling interest in the Dubai-based company. His name is Gen. Sheik Mohammed Bin Rashid Al-Maktoum. It just so happens that Sheik Maktoum also owns the deed to CAIR's headquarters located practically in the shadow of the U.S. Capitol. As I first reported in my book, "Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington," CAIR's deed is recorded in the name of his foundation, the Al-Maktoum Foundation. It put up more than $978,000 for the property and holds the rights to sell it, manage it and collect rents from other tenants in the multistory red-brick building on the CAIR property, located at 453 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., in Washington. (You can view the relevant pages of the documents on the book's companion website, sperryfiles.com.)
CAIR's landlord, Sheik Maktoum, doubles as UAE defense minister. Before 9/11, he provided UAE military C-130 cargo planes to supply al-Qaida hunting camps in Afghanistan with all the amenities they needed when he and other high-level UAE officials and princes took hunting trips there. On one trip in 1999, roughly half the UAE royal family was the guest of Osama bin laden at his camp near Kandahar. They flew in on an official UAE aircraft, according to a recently declassified CIA memo dated Feb. 19, 1999, and titled, "Recent High Level UAE Visits to Afghanistan." The memo also determined that Dubai officials had lied to U.S. officials about visiting the camps. And they were believed to have even tipped off bin Laden about a coming strike on his camps. Mind you, this was just months after bin Laden blew up the two U.S. embassies in Africa (a plot which was financed in part through Dubai banks), so they knew they were in bad company. Just like CAIR knows it's in bad company.
The Dubai officials also had a cozy relationship with the Taliban. By now you've probably heard that the UAE was one of only three countries in the world -- the others being Saudi Arabia and Pakistan -- to formally recognize the Taliban in diplomatic circles. What you haven't heard is that Dubai was one of the Taliban's only travel and financial outlets to the outside world. Dubai booked flights for them and acted as their banker. But CAIR doesn't care about that, either (nor apparently does the White House).
So with all the bonding that bin Laden did with Dubai royals before 9/11, it's little wonder that he deployed 13 of his 19 hijackers from Dubai to hit America. That's right, all 13 entered the U.S. from Dubai (and that's not even counting the original 20th hijacker Mohammed al-Katani, who also entered through Dubai before an alert INS inspector at Orlando airport sent him packing). Or little wonder that two were Emirates, and that one -- Marwan al-Shehhi -- in fact served under Sheik Maktoum in the UAE Army. He no doubt made the general proud by crashing his plane into the South Tower.
It's also not surprising, given Dubai's cozy ties to bin Laden and Taleb leaders, that the hijackers were able to use Dubai as their financial base in addition to their forward staging base. As they came through Dubai, they were outfitted by the nephew of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed with credit cards, cash, bank accounts and American-style clothing. More than $100,000 in al-Qaida funds were funneled through Dubai banks. One single transfer from Dubai into al-Shehhi's and his pal Mohamed Atta's Florida checking account totaled $70,000.
Will the ports deal be axed? Probably not BECAUSE this superficial little deal is nothing compared to all the other high-level, and sometimes behind the scenes, that we, the "little people," could and should never be allowed to understand.
The following revealed nugget should also make you sick:
"The Islamist Port of Miami."
by Joe Kaufman
Among those that run the State of Florida-owned port is Deputy Port Director of Miami, Khalid Salahuddin. Salahuddin is no stranger to controversy:
In November of 2001, he was embroiled in a scandal, as an NBC6 investigation exposed the Port of Miami as being a haven for criminal activity. According to the report, convicted felons - with cses ranging from attempted murder to pedophilia - were hired to work at the port.
From the news report:
Easy access to the port is not the only problem that concerns law enforcement. They're also alarmed that many of the people who work there have criminal records.
NBC 6 checked more than 1,300 members of the three major Longshoremens' unions listed in port records. We found nearly one in five are convicted felons in Florida. Their offenses include: attempted murder, armed robbery, assault and battery, trafficking in cocaine, grand theft, auto theft, and sex with a child. Despite a county law with strict guidelines on hiring convicted felons, nearly half who appeal to a special panel to work at the port are approved.
But the high numbers of felons on the port's workforce, often "dirty with drugs" and who knows what else, doesn't perturb the Deputy Director:
"From our standpoint, what benefit would it do to kick him out on the street? We see none," says Khalid Salahuddin, Deputy Port Director.
More about Salahuddin from Kaufman:
Khalid Salahuddin has gone through different phases in his life. Before becoming an ‘Orthodox Muslim,’ Salahuddin was a member of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan’s notoriously anti-Semitic organization. Today, he heads his own mosque in North Miami, Masjid Al-Ikhlas.
As a leader in the South Florida Islamic community, Salahuddin has traveled circles that leave little to be encouraged about. Indeed, his ties to radical Islam are many.
In February of 2002, Salahuddin officiated a fundraiser for the American Muslim Association of North America (AMANA), entitled ‘Celebrating Past, present and future Leadership for Humanity.’ AMANA is headed by Sofian Abdelaziz Zakkout, an individual who was the Vice President of a now-defunct, Hamas-related “charity,” the Health Resource Center for Palestine (HRCP). The website of AMANA has promoted links and articles denouncing Jews, Christians and Hindus and at least one link discussing the murder of homosexuals. The site also contained a link to the Al-Haramain foundation, an organization that has had its offices closed for acting as a main financier to al-Qaeda.
In September of 2002, Salahuddin was a participant at an event sponsored by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), entitled ‘A United and Secure Florida for all.’ CAIR’s connections to terrorism are well documented; the group has lost a fundraiser, a civil rights coordinator, a Director of Community Relations, and a co-founder of its Texas chapter all to conviction or deportation. Also featured at this event was Zulfiqar Ali Shah, the South Asia Division Coordinator for KindHearts, a “charity” whose funds were frozen this month by the U.S. government for giving millions of dollars to Hamas.
In November of 2002, Salahuddin gave a memorial talk for Hamid Iqbal Siddiqui, at Masjid Al-Ansar, where he (Salahuddin) had previously resided as imam. Before his death, Siddiqui had acted as an East Zone Representative for the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a group tied to the violent Muslim Brotherhood.
Evidently Salahuddin’s words have importance beyond these speaking engagements, because videos with his name and likeness are in distribution.
One speech made by Salahuddin (‘Belief in the Unseen’) is available through the MeccaCentric Da'wah Group, an organization that sells videotaped speeches made by numerous Islamic radicals; this includes Siraj Wahhaj, a man whose name appears on the U.S. Attorney's list of potential co-conspirators to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Also featured on the video with Salahuddin is Maulana Shafayat Mohamed, the imam of Darul Aloom (Pembroke Pines, Florida) and the former teacher of ‘Dirty Bomber’ Jose Padilla.
(See the original article for the many internal links)
There is reason for alarm for the infiltration and penetration is astounding. The associations and contacts of people like Deputy Port Director Salahuddin magnify the problems and the danger we face.
Finally, Kaufman asks a pertinent questions and then makes an observation:
It is certainly a valid concern as to who is purchasing the ports that control commerce to and from our country, especially when that purchase is carried out by a country with as many ties to terrorism as the UAE. Yet isn’t the concern that much greater, when one has to worry about those that are actually charged in defending the ports from the enemy?
In this case, our designated defender may very well be our downfall.
Could this be the reason why our borders are wide open and the ports so poorly check?
1 Comments:
At Thu Mar 02, 03:56:00 PM PST, Cubed © said…
"Will the ports deal be axed? Probably not BECAUSE this superficial little deal is nothing compared to all the other high-level, and sometimes behind the scenes, that we, the "little people," could and should never be allowed to understand."
Yup, you're right; I'm putting my money on Bush to twist enough arms to let this horrible, awful, hideous compact with the devil go through.
"The little people...could...never...understand" - Gee, thanks a bunch, Plato! Wasn't he SPECIAL?!
Post a Comment
<< Home